JetBrains Plugin Repository

Categories

Add new category ...

Home Custom Languages GroovyJ

Authors:: frasolo

opensource software

GroovyJ

Vendor: The Codehaus (Franck Rasolo)

Email:

Website: http://groovy.codeha...IntelliJ+IDEA+Plugin

License: license url

Bugtracker page

Description:

Integrates the Groovy language into IntelliJ IDEA

Downloads: 13394

Rating:

Participated in rating: 15

Comment and rate

Version	Since Build	Until Build	File/URL	Size (Kb)	Date	Dependency
0.1.9 (Demetra).	55.5755.	60.6500.	Download	2335.48.	2007-02-19 03:47:09	.
0.1.8 (Demetra).	55.5755.	60.6200.	Download	2204.88.	2006-11-21 03:44:24	.
0.1.8 (Demetra).	55.5755.	60.6100.	Download	2128.23.	2006-10-22 22:27:05	.
0.1.7 (Irida).	50.4155.	50.4999.	Download	1779.	2006-02-08 02:21:36	.
0.1.6 (Irida).	40.3500.	50.4100.	Download	1770.79.	2005-12-13 03:54:43	.
0.1.5 (Irida).	40.3429.	40.3550.	Download	1722.75.	2005-10-01 18:43:35	.
.						.

Recent change notes:

Updated Groovy runtime to Groovy 1.0

Known issue:

GROOVY-939: GroovyJ does not use the project JDK for compilation

Comments:

Comment and rate

Anonymous Rated: noRate 2007-05-25 13:45:02	In IDEA6.0.5 and groovyJ0.1.9,there is an exception ocurred when running a groovy script. Amusingly, the result of the script is fine. Original exception: com.intellij.openapi.compiler.ex.CompilerPathsEx.getCompilationClasspath(Lcom/intellij/openapi/module/Module;)Ljava/lang/String; java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com.intellij.openapi.compiler.ex.CompilerPathsEx.getCompilationClasspath(Lcom/intellij/openapi/module/Module;)Ljava/lang/String; at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.irida.IridaAPI.getCompilationClasspath(IridaAPI.java:35) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.createCompilationUnit(GroovyCompiler.java:132) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.createCompilationUnits(GroovyCompiler.java:116) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.findOrCreateCompilationUnits(GroovyCompiler.java:110) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.mapModulesToSourceAndTestCompilationUnits(GroovyCompiler.java:96) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.compile(GroovyCompiler.java:83) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.access$000(GroovyCompiler.java:49) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler$1.run(GroovyCompiler.java:74) at com.intellij.openapi.application.impl.ApplicationImpl.runReadAction(ApplicationImpl.java:271) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.compile(GroovyCompiler.java:72) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver.a(CompileDriver.java:420) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver.a(CompileDriver.java:653) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver.a(CompileDriver.java:624) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver.a(CompileDriver.java:73) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver.access$400(CompileDriver.java:87) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver$5$1.run(CompileDriver.java:0) at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.runProcess(ProgressManagerImpl.java:51) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver$5.run(CompileDriver.java:3) .
Anonymous Rated: 2007-04-28 13:10:48	You're using an old version of the plugin. Make sure you get the latest one through the plugin manager. .
Anonymous Rated: noRate 2007-04-28 09:46:14	The latest version of IDEA (6.0.5) doesn't seem to care for the GroovyJ plugin. Here is the error: Original exception: com.intellij.openapi.compiler.ex.CompilerPathsEx.getCompilationClasspath(Lcom/intellij/openapi/module/Module;)Ljava/lang/String; java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com.intellij.openapi.compiler.ex.CompilerPathsEx.getCompilationClasspath(Lcom/intellij/openapi/module/Module;)Ljava/lang/String; at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.irida.IridaAPI.getCompilationClasspath(IridaAPI.java:35) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.createCompilationUnit(GroovyCompiler.java:132) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.createCompilationUnits(GroovyCompiler.java:116) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.findOrCreateCompilationUnits(GroovyCompiler.java:110) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.mapModulesToSourceAndTestCompilationUnits(GroovyCompiler.java:96) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.compile(GroovyCompiler.java:83) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.access$000(GroovyCompiler.java:49) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler$1.run(GroovyCompiler.java:74) at com.intellij.openapi.application.impl.ApplicationImpl.runReadAction(ApplicationImpl.java:271) at org.codehaus.groovy.intellij.compiler.GroovyCompiler.compile(GroovyCompiler.java:72) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver.a(CompileDriver.java:420) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver.a(CompileDriver.java:653) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver.a(CompileDriver.java:624) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver.a(CompileDriver.java:73) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver.access$400(CompileDriver.java:87) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver$5$1.run(CompileDriver.java:0) at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.runProcess(ProgressManagerImpl.java:51) at com.intellij.compiler.impl.CompileDriver$5.run(CompileDriver.java:3) .
Anonymous Rated: 2006-11-28 18:59:34	.
Anonymous Rated: 2006-11-28 18:58:47	The update adds nothing. Looking for features like the built in javascript support. .
frasolo Rated: 2006-10-22 22:40:45	Why don't you raise this issue on the groovy-user list or even better in JIRA? You're more likely to be heard that way. .
Anonymous Rated: 2006-10-11 18:24:08	out of date and dead... unfortunately. it was a nice start and i'd love to have it working. .
Anonymous Rated: 2006-07-08 10:18:56	Groovy becomes more and more important! We need such kind of plugins. Please make it available for the latest EAP version. Many thanx!!! .
Anonymous Rated: 2006-05-21 09:14:02	.
Anonymous Rated: 2006-05-16 14:37:37	This one is always presented as a parade implementation of the so called new language API. Sorry, I'm dissapointed. I don't know who's guilty: bad plug-in implementation or bad and complex language API. From a user perspective, this is not relevant: the plug-in does not what users would expect from a language API implementation. .
Anonymous Rated:	It's very incomplete and not much more than just sythax highlight. A Language API integration should look totally different (e.g. like the javascript plug-in). .
Anonymous Rated:	I would like to see closer integration with the IntelliJ internals, many intentions don't currently work and ctrl-/ doesn't toggle line comments (except on the liast line!?) .
Anonymous Rated:	.
Anonymous Rated:	.
Anonymous Rated:	.
Anonymous Rated:	Excellent plugin! It should even be integrated in IntelliJ and be developped by JetBrains themselves! .